Controls agreed before access
BS7858 screening before access; client-approved tools and infrastructure.
Read the security commitmentsControls agreed before access. BS7858 screening before access; client-approved tools and infrastructure. Read the security commitments.
30 minutes with James Rooney to discuss your team, workflow and first scope.
For leaders, risk owners and delivery teams who need to decide which AI systems to use, who may approve them and what evidence must exist before they act.
Keep a proportionate inventory of AI systems, their owners and the decisions they support. Use consequence to decide where deeper review belongs.
Name the decision owner and define review gates before building. Risk and compliance help design the workflow alongside product and engineering.
Produce evaluation results, access decisions and review records while the system is built. Your legal owner determines the applicable legal test; this is not legal advice.
Use a 30-minute call to discuss the outcome your team needs.
Book a 30-minute callIdentify the AI systems, affected people and consequences of a wrong answer or action. Keep the initial inventory proportionate to the decisions it supports.
Consider consequence first, then ask counsel to apply the relevant legal test. A consequence assessment supports the discussion; it does not determine a legal classification.
Use client-approved tools in client infrastructure, with scoped identity and human review. Retain evidence of checks and decisions as part of delivery.
Ask how this approach would fit your data, systems and team on a 30-minute call.
Book a 30-minute callBS7858 screening before access; client-approved tools and infrastructure.
Read the security commitmentsAt PPL, a security review ran roughly every fifth prompt, with client-approved tools and client infrastructure. The greenfield build remained a working proof of concept: nothing moved into production and no regulatory or audit position changed.
Read the PPL operating-model case studyBook 30 minutes to ask James about the work and how it relates to your situation.
Book a 30-minute callAgree the workflow, deliverables and team before work starts. These are the existing engagements this use case can sit within; prices exclude VAT.
Fixed price · £44,000
4 weeks
Find the AI workflows worth funding. Test them with your team.
See scope, team and termsFixed price · £20k–£55k
2–4 weeks
Build and test one AI workflow in your own tenancy.
See scope, team and termsFixed price · £120k or £180k
90 days
One workflow in production and in use in 90 days.
See scope, team and termsUse a 30-minute call to decide which scope is a sensible starting point.
Book a 30-minute callA 30-minute discovery call with James Rooney. Bring a workflow, product or team challenge and we will discuss a sensible first scope.
most start with a fixed-price AI Readiness Audit · £44,000 · 4 weeks · working prototypes
No time that suits? Email hello@tenhaw.com. Calendar not loading? Open it on cal.com.
Describe the work in a paragraph. James replies with a rough scope and budget range within two working days.
It means introducing AI under agreed access, data and review controls. Tenhaw works in client infrastructure, uses only AI tools approved by the client in writing and keeps security review inside the working method.
Keep a proportionate AI inventory, name the people responsible for decisions, set review gates by consequence and produce evidence during delivery. Risk and compliance participate in designing how the work runs. This is not legal advice.
ISO/IEC 42001 is a certifiable AI management-system standard. The EU AI Act is legislation whose application depends on the system and its use, including placement on the EU market. Your legal owner determines the obligations; certification does not itself settle them. This is not legal advice.
We use two passes: consider the consequences of the system first, then apply the legal test with counsel. A workflow with serious consequences deserves attention even before its legal classification is settled. This is not legal advice.
Only tools you have approved in writing for that engagement. Tenhaw’s published security commitments include zero-retention or enterprise model agreements, client infrastructure and identity, least privilege and no retention of client production data.
Both. They belong in operating-model design so decision rights, escalation and evidence are agreed before implementation. Review gates then check the system against that agreed design. This is not legal advice.
Governance runs inside the £44,000 readiness audit, £20,000–£55,000 proof of concept and £120,000 or £180,000 90-day programme. Standalone governance is scoped at the published day rates: partner £1,560, senior practitioner £1,250 and associate £950, excluding VAT.
No. The published position is “ISO/IEC 42001 (AI management systems), under assessment, and increasingly the one clients ask for”. Cyber Essentials Plus certification is in progress; ISO 27001 has a gap assessment complete, with certification targeted for 2027.