Colart: Turning three merged teams into one delivery unit through workflow design
The challenge
After Colart merged its Global Marketing, Development, and Business Intelligence teams, the new Digital Team lacked alignment, communication channels, and consistent delivery, stalling key transformation work including a new e-commerce site.
What we did
We designed agile processes for a cross-functional team, aligned Jira workflows to how the business actually worked, established clear communication channels, matured the backlog to cut downtime, used data to guide prioritisation, and escalated critical issues to senior leadership when needed.
// run against The Tenhaw Way, published in full and free to adopt without engaging us
The outcome
The Digital Team became cohesive and predictable, transformation work progressed consistently, and the e-commerce website shipped successfully.
Limits, and what is withheld
What transfers is that an agent needs exactly what this merged team needed: an unambiguous definition of a piece of work, a state model to move it through, and somewhere to escalate when it cannot. The process, workflow and backlog design that gave three merged functions those three things is the same groundwork an agentic operating model stands on.
Why a buyer usually lands on this one
Written for the person arriving mid-programme with a question.
A merger produces an org chart, not a team
Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence became a Digital Team by announcement. What was missing was mundane and decisive: a shared definition of a piece of work, a workflow matching how the business actually operated, and a channel where a decision could be made rather than restated.
Every organisation attempting agentic change hits the same wall in a smaller form. An agent needs an unambiguous definition of the work, a state model it can move things through, and somewhere to escalate. Teams that have never agreed those between humans cannot hand them to software.
Workflow is the interface
The Jira workflows were aligned to how the business worked rather than to a template, and the backlog was matured to the point that the team stopped waiting on itself. That sounds like administration. It is the interface layer.
When a buyer asks an AI implementation partner why their pilot never widened, the answer is frequently here: the work the agent was given had no stable representation outside a conversation, so nothing could be measured, routed or handed back.
Your context will differ from this one. Thirty minutes is enough to say by how much.
Talk it throughWhat this engagement does not claim
The same caveats the case studies hub carries, narrowed to this engagement so nothing here is a surprise to your analyst.
- 01
Not an AI engagement.
Agile process design, workflow design and prioritisation. No models, no agents.
- 02
The e-commerce build was the client's.
We designed the processes and workflows the team delivered through, and escalated what needed escalating. The platform itself was built by Colart's Digital Team.
If you want to know whether we have done your version of this, ask on the call and we will answer plainly.
Talk it throughOther engagements
Sector first, because that is the next question. All twelve are on the hub, grouped into the two we would call AI work and the ten we would not.
Landing the Discovery+ launch on a CEO-set deadline
6, development teams on the launch, one of them the visual rebrand team James ran
Making a pandemic-era app team predictable, and trusted again
2, squads: Mobile App and Integration
Coordinating five agile teams through a £1bn e-commerce re-platform
£1bn, re-platforming programme
Or skip the reading and ask which of these is closest to your problem.
Talk it throughSee how we did it
A real engagement walked through by the person who led it, then the same method applied to yours.
- The ways of working, published in full and free to adopt without hiring us.
- The target operating model James co-led at HSBC: designed and piloted for 500 teams, with global rollout due in 2026 and not yet rolled out.
- The AI build inside a live London specialty insurer: a working proof of concept, month by month, with the client anonymised to a market.
Everything the call covers about our work is already published on this site. What it adds is the person who did that work, and your own situation put through the same method.
The 30-minute discovery call starts with your problem. This one starts with our work.
Pick a time on cal.comWant the same thing, in your organisation?
A 30-minute call with James Rooney. We will tell you which parts of this we have done before and which we would be doing for the first time, and you will leave with a rough scope either way.
most start with a fixed-price AI Readiness Audit · £44,000 · 4 weeks · working prototypes
Calendar not loading? Open it on cal.com or email hello@tenhaw.com.
Questions about this engagement
What did Tenhaw do for Colart?
Over six months we turned three newly merged teams, Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence, into one working Digital Team. The work was process and workflow design: agile processes built for a cross-functional team, Jira workflows aligned to how the business actually worked, clear communication channels, a matured backlog that cut downtime, and data-guided prioritisation, with critical issues escalated to senior leadership when needed. The result was a cohesive, predictable team, transformation work that progressed consistently, and an e-commerce website that shipped successfully. The discipline behind that, one agreed definition of a finished piece of work and one route for moving it, is what turned three merged functions into a single delivery unit.
Why do merged teams stop delivering after a reorganisation?
Because the merger creates a team on the org chart before it creates one in practice. When Colart merged its Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence teams, the new Digital Team had no shared alignment, no established communication channels and no consistent way of delivering, and key transformation work stalled, including a new e-commerce site. Nobody in that situation is underperforming individually. The connective tissue is missing. So the fix at Colart was structural, not motivational. We agreed processes for the cross-functional team, matched workflows to the real work, made the communication channels explicit, and gave the team a route to senior leadership for the issues it could not resolve itself.
Can agile work across marketing, development and business intelligence teams?
Yes, when the process is designed for the mixed team rather than borrowed from software engineering and imposed on everyone else. At Colart the new Digital Team combined Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence, and we designed agile processes for that cross-functional shape, with Jira workflows aligned to how the business actually worked. Clear communication channels and data-guided prioritisation did the rest. The team became cohesive and predictable, and the stalled e-commerce website shipped successfully.
Is it worth redesigning Jira workflows around how the business works?
It was at Colart. A workflow that mirrors how work actually moves through the business gets used honestly; one that mirrors a tool's defaults gets worked around, and the board stops telling the truth about delivery. We aligned Colart's Jira workflows to how the newly merged Digital Team really operated, as part of a wider redesign covering agile processes, communication channels and a matured backlog. Delivery became consistent enough that the stalled e-commerce build progressed and shipped. The workflow itself is not the point; it is the state model that makes a piece of work unambiguous, and that is what the merged team had been missing.
How does a mature backlog reduce downtime?
A matured backlog means the next piece of work is already defined, understood and ready when the team finishes the current one, so nobody idles while requirements are chased or decisions are awaited. At Colart, maturing the backlog was one of the specific levers we used, and less downtime is the result the study records. It matters most in a newly merged team, because the person who used to answer a quick question across the desk may now sit in a different part of the organisation, and every ill-defined item turns into a wait. Combined with data-guided prioritisation, it kept Colart's Digital Team delivering consistently.
How do you prioritise when newly merged teams disagree?
Data settled it. Three merged teams arrived at Colart with their own views of what mattered, so we used data to guide prioritisation and the backlog began reflecting evidence instead of whichever function argued loudest. Two other mechanisms mattered alongside it. A matured backlog meant every item was well enough defined to be compared honestly. A clear escalation route meant the critical issues the team could not settle went to senior leadership before they festered. Prioritisation disputes are usually a symptom of missing structure. The people are rarely the problem. Once the structure existed, Colart's Digital Team delivered predictably.
How long does it take to align merged teams into one delivery unit?
At Colart it took six months to take three merged teams, Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence, from stalled and misaligned to cohesive and predictable, with the e-commerce website shipped along the way. Most of that time went into design work. We shaped agile processes for a cross-functional team, matched the Jira workflows to the real work, set up communication channels people actually used, and matured the backlog to the point where downtime fell. The honest caveat is that six months describes this organisation, not every merger. The pattern transfers. The number is theirs.
Did Colart's e-commerce platform actually ship?
Yes. The e-commerce website was among the key transformation work that stalled while Colart's merged Digital Team lacked alignment and consistent delivery, and it shipped successfully once the team was working as one unit. The causal chain is worth being clear about. We designed the processes, Jira workflows and communication channels that let the merged team build the platform, and Colart's own engineers built it. That distinction is one to check in any consultancy's case studies. The delivery discipline was ours. The engineering was Colart's own people, unblocked.
What does a workflow design engagement have to do with agentic AI?
More than it first appears. An AI agent needs the same things Colart's merged team needed. It has to know what a piece of work is, how to move it through a state model, and where to escalate when it cannot proceed. Design those well for people and you have designed most of what an agentic operating model needs later. Colart is what that groundwork looks like in practice. Three merged functions ran off a single backlog and a single state model, and a stalled e-commerce site shipped once the team worked as one unit.
Was the Colart work delivered by Tenhaw or by James personally?
Colart is one of the engagements delivered under the Tenhaw banner, alongside Anglo American, Yondr, Greggs, Tecknuovo and Globelynx. Several of those predate the company's incorporation and were delivered by James Rooney personally on contract, and we will walk you through which is which on a call rather than blur the line in marketing copy. The delivery experience is the same either way, because James leads every Tenhaw engagement personally today. We keep this separate from the HSBC, Microsoft, Sky, F1 and Discovery track record, which were the founder's delivery and transformation roles inside those organisations.
Does a retail AI operating model start with the team or the technology?
With the team. A retail AI operating model is mostly a set of agreements about how work is defined and moved between functions, and Colart is the pre-AI version of that argument. When Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence merged into one Digital Team, the team had no shared alignment, no established communication channels and no consistent way of delivering, and a new e-commerce site stalled. Six months of process, Jira workflow and backlog design made it cohesive and predictable, and the site shipped. If those three functions cannot agree today what a finished piece of work looks like, no agent will settle it for them.
Can't our own delivery managers fix a stalled merged team?
Often, yes. If leadership is aligned and the merged functions already trust one way of working, run it in-house and keep the fee. It gets harder when the shape of the merger is the problem. Colart's new Digital Team combined Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence, and a process shaped around any one of those sets of habits tends to be quietly ignored by the other two, so whoever designs it has to work for the mixed team without belonging to a part of it. That took six months at Colart, alongside a standing route to senior leadership for the calls the team could not make itself. If your own managers can hold both, you do not need us.
What if senior leaders ignore the issues a team escalates?
Then the escalation route is decoration, and no amount of workflow design compensates for it. Escalating critical issues to senior leadership was one of the named mechanisms at Colart, and it only counts as a mechanism if somebody answers. A team that raises a blocker and hears nothing learns to stop raising blockers, so the risk log goes quiet while the risks carry on. Test it before you design around it. Take one properly blocked item, escalate it, and time how long a decision takes. If the answer is never, that is the thing to fix first, and no board redesign will hide it.
What does fixing a team's communication channels actually involve?
Less than a governance framework and more than a new chat channel. Colart's merged Digital Team spanned Global Marketing, Development and Business Intelligence, and making its channels explicit meant agreeing where each kind of request or decision gets raised, who the three functions go to for what, and where critical issues go when the team cannot settle them itself, which at Colart was senior leadership. A merger quietly removes the informal routes people relied on before anyone notices they have gone. The symptoms then look like poor delivery rather than poor plumbing. It was one of the levers that got the stalled e-commerce work moving again.
How do you stop merged teams quietly re-forming as silos?
Make them share the artefacts, not just the org chart. Three functions can sit in one Jira project and still run three processes, so at Colart the shared layer was designed deliberately: agile processes built for the cross-functional team rather than lifted from one function's habits, Jira workflows aligned to how the business actually worked, and one backlog the whole Digital Team drew its next piece of work from. Silos re-form through small defaults, a separate board here, a private thread there, and the way to stop that is to leave nowhere sensible for those defaults to live. Six months in, the team was predictable and the e-commerce site had shipped.