Greggs: Making a pandemic-era app team predictable, and trusted again

A rushed app launch left a technical department that the rest of the business no longer trusted. We made delivery predictable, and used data to prove that paying down tech debt made it faster.
Delivery
Rung
Scrum Master support across two squads, plus agile coaching beyond engineering.
Duration
6 months
Engagement shape
Scrum Master support across two squads, plus agile coaching beyond engineering.
Stage reachedDelivery transformation, not AI work
2squads: Mobile App and Integration
Org-wideagile coaching beyond engineering
Tech debtshown to speed up delivery, with data
On this page

The challenge

Greggs launched a mobile app so customers could order and earn rewards, but the rushed setup of technical ways of working created friction with Marketing and other departments. They needed Scrum Master support for two squads plus broader agile coaching across the business.

What we did

We refined Story Points for capacity-based tracking, coached Product on data-driven prioritisation, and ran prioritisation workshops and alignment sessions that taught non-technical teams how agile actually works. We used data to prove the payback of addressing tech debt.

// run against The Tenhaw Way, published in full and free to adopt without engaging us

The outcome

Delivery became predictable, confidence in the technical department recovered, and prioritisation conversations became realistic and focused. The data showing tech debt accelerated timelines strengthened collaboration across departments.

Limits, and what is withheld

What transfers, and what does not

Cross-functional trust and a shared, data-backed language for value are prerequisites for agentic change. Agents amplify whatever operating culture they land in, so the culture has to be sound first. What does not transfer is the technology. This was coaching and prioritisation work with no AI in it.

Context

Why a buyer usually lands on this one

Written for the person arriving mid-programme with a question.

The department nobody outside it believes

The recurring pattern here is not technical. A team ships under pressure, ways of working get invented on the way, and within a year the rest of the business treats every estimate from that department as fiction. Prioritisation then becomes a negotiation about credibility rather than about value.

AI makes this worse before it makes it better. A head of AI inheriting a department in that position will find the blocker to their programme is not the model, it is that no commitment the department makes is believed, so nothing can be sequenced.

Tech debt, argued with numbers

The claim that paying down tech debt accelerates delivery is usually made as an engineering opinion and lost as a budget conversation. We made it with throughput data instead, which is how it survived contact with Marketing.

The same argument is coming for every organisation trying to scale AI agents onto an estate whose interfaces and data are undocumented. Agents are unusually sensitive to exactly what tech debt describes: inconsistent schemas, undocumented side effects, and workflows that only exist in one person's head.

read this before you cite it

What this engagement does not claim

The same caveats the case studies hub carries, narrowed to this engagement so nothing here is a surprise to your analyst.

  1. 01

    Not an AI engagement.

    Scrum Master support for two squads and agile coaching across the business. No models, no agents.

  2. 02

    The recovery of trust is qualitative.

    Delivery predictability was measured. The recovery of confidence in the technical department is reported as it was described to us at the time, not as a metric.

the other call

See how we did it

A real engagement walked through by the person who led it, then the same method applied to yours.

  • The ways of working, published in full and free to adopt without hiring us.
  • The target operating model James co-led at HSBC: designed and piloted for 500 teams, with global rollout due in 2026 and not yet rolled out.
  • The AI build inside a live London specialty insurer: a working proof of concept, month by month, with the client anonymised to a market.

Everything the call covers about our work is already published on this site. What it adds is the person who did that work, and your own situation put through the same method.

The 30-minute discovery call starts with your problem. This one starts with our work.

Pick a time on cal.com
book a call

Want the same thing, in your organisation?

A 30-minute call with James Rooney. We will tell you which parts of this we have done before and which we would be doing for the first time, and you will leave with a rough scope either way.

most start with a fixed-price AI Readiness Audit · £30k–£90k · 6–8 weeks

// pick a slot · cal.com/tenhaw/professional-servicesLIVE CALENDAR

Calendar not loading? Open it on cal.com or email hello@tenhaw.com.